PUB-5007

McNeil, T. (2020). Federal rulemaking: Information on selected agencies’ management of public comments. GAO Reports, 1–12.
This article articulates the rulemaking in the Federal Register. It provides examples of federal agencies that are receiving comments on the public comment process from selected agencies and subject matter experts, and/or user groups.

Tosun, J., & Howlett, M. (2021). Managing slow onset events related to climate change: The role of public bureaucracy. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 50, 43–53.
This article is interesting as it talks about the changes of climate change and how it will affect public policy and public bureaucracy and provides a model of bureaucratic influence on climate policymaking.

Day, G. S., & Shea, G. (2020).
Changing the work of innovation: A systems approach. California Management Review, 63(1), 41–60.
This case study explores Whirlpool and how a change system can propel the success of an organization.

Sonmezturk Bolatan, G. I., & Karaman Akgul, A. (2019). Analysis of the relationship between strategic planning and total quality management. Cag University Journal of Social Sciences, 16(2), 1–19.
In this study, the effect of strategic planning on TQM success was evaluated. Quantitative methodology was applied. The results indicated that more emphasis needs to be given to quality results, information, and analysis, as well as management commitment and leadership.

Johanson, J.-E., Johnsen, Å., Pekkola, E., & Reid, S. A. (2019). Strategic management in Finnish and Norwegian Government Agencies. Administrative Sciences (2076-3387), 9(4), 80.
This study is interesting as it shows the international approach of strategic management in government. The article introduces the design and implementation of strategic planning and performance management in governmental agencies in two Nordic countries, Finland and Norway. It also shows the centralized government strategic planning efforts of Finland.

Starke, A. M. (2018). Pariahs no more? On the status of theory and theorists in contemporary public administration.Administrative Theory & Praxis, 40(2), 143–149. https://doi-org.proxy1.ncu.edu/10.1080/10841806.2018.1458206
This is an interesting article showing the changes in the philosophy of public administration. It shows the current state of theory in public administration viewed from the perspective of the scholar.