DMFT-7201 v4

Gayed, A., Bryan, B. T., Petrie, K., Deady, M., Milner, A., LaMontagne, A. D., Calvo, R. A., Mackinnon, A., Christensen, H., Mykletun, A., Glozier, N., & Harvey, S. B. (2018). A protocol for the HeadCoach trial: the development and evaluation of an online mental health training program for workplace managers. BMC Psychiatry, 18(1), 25-35. https://doi-org.proxy1.ncu.edu/10.1186/s12888-018-1603-4
This article provides the evaluation process and effectiveness of a newly developed online training intervention to determine whether it can build managers' confidence to better support individuals within their teams who are experiencing mental ill-health. They used randomized control trial (RTC) to evaluate the Head Coach, an online training intervention.

Power, T., East, L., Gao, Y., Usher, K., & Jackson, D. (2021). A mixed-methods evaluation of an urban Aboriginal diabetes lifestyle program. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 45(2), 143–149. https://doi-org.proxy1.ncu.edu/10.1111/1753-6405.13092
This article discusses the use of mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative methods) to conduct an evaluation.

Guyadeen, D., & Seasons, M. (2018). Evaluation theory and practice: Comparing program evaluation and evaluation in planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 38(1), 98–110. https://doi-org.proxy1.ncu.edu/10.1177/0739456X16675930
This article reviews the major approaches of program evaluation and evaluation in planning. The challenges to evaluating plans and planning are discussed, including the reliance on ex-ante evaluations, a lack of outcome evaluation methodologies, the attribution gap, and institutional hurdles.

Calley, N. G. (2010). Program development in the 21st century: An evidence-based approach to design, implementation, and evaluation. SAGE Publications.
Read Chapter 12. This chapter discusses the differentiation between treatment fidelity assessment, process evaluation, and outcomes evaluation. It will also explore the significance of research design in program evaluation and the concept of a culture of evaluation.

Emengo, V. N., Williams, M. S., Odusanya, R., Uwemedimo, O. T., Martinez, J., Pekmezaris, R., & Kim, E. J. (2020). Qualitative program evaluation of social determinants of health screening and referral program. PloS One, 15(12), e0242964. https://doi-org.proxy1.ncu.edu/10.1371/journal.pone.0242964
This article shares the qualitative program evaluation process, qualitative analysis of a semi-structured and focus group interview.