ID-8910 v1

In this week’s readings, you will explore some of the affordances and constraints of instructional design models.  Exploring what others think of instructional design models, the concepts or elements that are present, and those that are missing, will help you as you design your own model in Week 5. All the assigned, required articles for the week require an intense review of design models.  Keep in mind that the four we are using for class, Dick and Cary, ASSURE, Kemp, and Backward Design, are seasoned and time-tested.   Reading the articles will help you think about designing your own model in Week 8.

• The Design Models We Have Are Not the Design Models We Need

  •  Moore, S. L. (1970, January 1). The design models we have are not the design models we need. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design.

• An Examination of the Systemic Reach of Instructional Design Models: A Systematic Review.

  • Stefaniak, J., & Xu, M. (2020). An examination of the systemic reach of instructional design models: A systematic review. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning: A Publication of the Association for Educational Communications & Technology, 64(5), 710–719.

• What Models are Instructional Designers Using Today.
  • Bond, J., & Dirkin, K. (1970, January 1). What models are instructional designers using today?  Edtechbooks.
• How Do We Train Instructional Designers?: Instructional Design as Negotiation.
  • Kim, S. M. (2015, January). How do we train instructional designers?: Instructional design as negotiation. Research Gate.
• Psychology, Instructional Design, and the Use of Technology: Behavioral, Cognitive, and Affordances Perspectives. 
  • Rabinowitz, M., & Shaw, E. J. (2005, May). Psychology, instructional design, and the use of technology: Behavioral, cognitive, and affordances perspectives. ResearchGate.